Barclay Enterprises, Inc.
2275 LaCrosse Ave #201
Colton, CA 92324
Chris and Rick Barclay of
Barclay Enterprises, Inc. have been relentlessly and obsessively
attacking our company for 3 years. From harassing automated phone calls
to deceiving products and advertisements aimed directly at us.... and everything
in between, no matter how deceptive or unprofessional.
Chris and Rick Barclay
completely refuse to respond to our attempts to contact them about these
attacks. They are given ample opportunity to reply to emails, forum postings and
comments. While they eagerly point out every attempt (in as negative light as
possible) they have notonce replied. As far as we know they have never
attempted to contact us in any way.
Again, Chris and Rick. We'd love to hear your
side of the story personally. Let us know if any of our accusations are
unfounded and we'll discuss removing them.
800-797-0070 contact us by email
This page was created in
response to Barclay Enterprises attempts to bury our search engine rankings by
making fictitious companies, buying up URLs and creating link farms.
Barclay Enterprises has several
other "companies"
These are set up to appear as separate identities.
Preferred Telecomm
(http://www.preferredtel.com) - also claims to be FCC
authorized
We are not sure how long Barclay has been falsely claiming FCC
status. In 2/2006 They attacked our repair services in eBay
advertisements "Don't be fooled by cheap copycat repair facilities
that are not FCC authorized..." Coincidentally in the
same week, our eBay repair auctions were removed from eBay for minor
details, one even called "an unpublished rule" by eBay employees. We
also immediately started getting harassing phone calls to our toll-free
number several times a day from 3 different computer generated sources,
all originating from the west side of the US.
We looked into Barclay's claims of being FCC authorized and found
them to be completely false. As we started to point out this fact,
Barclay expanded their claims including the use of FCC logos and
graphics. Barclay also provided pictures of alleged FCC Registration
scans to back up their claims. These scans of registrations had nothing
to do with "Authorizations" or "Certifications" and they were fake!
Barclay Enterprises, Inc had never even been issued an FCC registration.
We started a "bad-guy" post on a popular telecom forum where we declared Barclay was illegally
claiming FCC status. Barclay complained at length about the forum
message but their only official reply in the forum itself was to hint at
legal action. They were never able to provide even an excuse for their
behavior. However, through that forum posting we did learn one important
fact. Even if Barclay had an FCC registration, it was nothing more
than a serial number to put on specific (now antique) telephones!
These serial numbers became invalid in the late 80's or early 90's. It
cost only about $50 to get one. There were no tests, inspections or
restrictions involved. Anyone with $50 could get one!
We told Barclay if they did not remove all claims of FCC status from
their web site and advertisements we would report them to the FTC and
FCC. Barclays response was to change the wording only. They went from
"FCC authorized" to "FCC registered" and even "had been FCC registered".
Unfortunately the FCC and FTC were not motivated to look into this
false advertising scheme. After a few weeks, when Barclay had not heard
anything from them, they changed the wording back to "FCC Authorized"
So, why the change? It proves even Barclay does not believe what they
claim.
Almost a year later, they have been forced to remove their claims
of being FCC authorized by the Better Business Bureau but still cannot
let it go! They will apparently do anything to fool a few
customers into believing an old serial number (for antique
bell ringer phones) attached to their old company name and at
their old address, is somehow relevant to their current repair
service. Are they that desperate to provide their customers with a good
reason to use their services? Looks that way.....
The FCC would not have registered "Barclay - Hare Enterprises" and left out the
"Hare" on the form. The company address is also strangely missing.
Quote: "The result will be "Barclay
- Hare Enterprises, Inc.", which was our original name" Read the RED SQUARE AREA to learn these forms expired
when and IF they changed their corporate name and were only good on
specific equipment.
Even IF Barclay and Barclay-Hare are the same people, this
is only a registration (just a serial number) that cost just $50, anyone
could get one and it expired 18 years ago!
“If you write about someone else, you can
stretch the truth from here to Finland. If you write about yourself the
slightest deviation makes you realize instantly that there may be honor among
thieves, but you are just a dirty liar.” -Groucho Marx